The Scott Letter closed-end fund newsletter archive

Newsletter Archive

The Scott Letter: Closed-End Fund Report

Published from 1988 to 1996 and again 2001 to 2018, The Scott Letter offers a 30-year record of the evolution of closed-end funds and related investment companies. Founded and edited by George Cole Scott, the early issues (1988–1996) were written in a classic newsletter style, blending market commentary, fund analysis, and educational features designed to guide investors through the cycles following the 1987 crash and into the 1990s bull market.

Beginning in 2001, the publication shifted toward a more modern format—feature articles and interviews with fund managers, industry leaders, and market strategists—capturing insights directly from decision makers while still preserving the long-term focus on value, discounts, and income. Together, these archives represent one of the most comprehensive and enduring collections of closed-end fund commentary available to investors, researchers, and historians.

Filters

Showing 1–12 of 220








The Scott Letter, April 1988
I1
April 1988

The April 1988 Scott Letter introduced closed-end funds to new investors, contrasting them with open-end mutual funds. In the wake of the 1987 crash, it highlighted deep discounts of up to 50% to NAV as rare buying opportunities. The issue emphasized fund selection, tax efficiency, historical context, and promised readers ongoing analysis, education, and recommendations.

The Scott Letter, May 1988
I2
May 1988

The May 1988 Scott Letter argued that the post-crash U.S. economy remained healthy, with strong consumer spending, exports, and low unemployment supporting stability. Closed-end funds were outperforming the Dow, particularly in small-cap equities. The issue stressed the importance of risk tolerance, profiled General American Investors, and pointed readers toward discounted and convertible closed-end funds as compelling opportunities.

The Scott Letter, June 1988
I3
June 1988

The June 1988 Scott Letter warned investors about common mistakes, including chasing unrealistic returns and ignoring stated fund objectives. It profiled Adams Express as a conservative total-return fund, highlighted Baker Fentress’s undervalued land holdings, reviewed the ICI annual meeting, and recommended John Hancock Investors Trust as a defensive bond option for those navigating market uncertainty.

The Scott Letter, July 1988
I4
July 1988

The July 1988 Scott Letter cautioned against market timing and chasing prior winners, urging patience and discipline. It profiled Tri-Continental as a blue-chip holding vehicle, praised MassMutual Corporate Investors’ strong bond performance, and reaffirmed long-term value recommendations such as Gabelli Equity Trust, Adams Express, and Baker Fentress as sound choices for investors seeking stability and growth.

The Scott Letter, August 1988
I5
August 1988

The August 1988 Scott Letter examined international investing, stressing risks like currency swings, higher expenses, and global market integration. It profiled the Clemente Global Growth Fund, still seen as a bargain at steep discounts, and the Helvetia “Switzerland” Fund as a conservative overseas option. Updates noted strong results from Adams Express, Convertible Holdings, Gabelli Equity Trust, and General American Investors.

The Scott Letter, September 1988
I6
September 1988

The September 1988 Scott Letter highlighted John Templeton’s global value principles and the rise of the AAII in educating individual investors. Closed-end funds posted solid first-half gains with narrowing discounts, aided by high payouts at select funds. The issue revisited Baker Fentress’s land-rich portfolio, while providing updates on Clemente Global, Convertible Holdings, and General American Investors.

The Scott Letter, October 1988
I7
October 1988

The October 1988 Scott Letter profiled Martin Zweig, who famously predicted the 1987 crash, and introduced Schafer Value Trust and Royce Value Trust as value-oriented newcomers. It cautioned against leveraged bond fund fads, updated on the Pickens challenge at Clemente Global, and urged investors to focus on asset allocation rather than market timing.

The Scott Letter, November 1988
I8
November 1988

The November 1988 Scott Letter profiled John Templeton’s global value strategy, highlighting patience, low turnover, and the launch of the Templeton Emerging Markets Fund under Dr. Mark Mobius. It also reviewed Quest for Value’s dual-purpose structure, critiqued the New Orleans Investors Conference for its narrow “goldbug” focus, and noted a surge in new closed-end bond offerings.

The Scott Letter, December 1988
I9
December 1988

The December 1988 Scott Letter profiled the Cypress Fund, emphasizing William Reik’s strategy of concentrated investments in family-controlled, franchise-driven companies like Neutrogena and Church & Dwight. It noted the fund’s steep discount and stock repurchase program, while urging stronger dividend support. The issue also reviewed year-end tax-selling discounts, ranked top-performing funds, and questioned payout policies versus repurchase programs.

The Scott Letter, January 1989
II1
January 1989

The January 1989 Scott Letter analyzed rising takeover activity in the closed-end fund sector, spotlighting Liberty All-Star Equity Fund and its multi-manager structure. It also reviewed H&Q Health Care Fund, emphasizing biotechnology and healthcare growth opportunities. The issue discussed portfolio diversification, venture capital potential, and investor caution, while forecasting continued value in disciplined closed-end fund investing.

The Scott Letter, February 1989
II2
February 1989

The February 1989 Scott Letter profiled the Morgan Grenfell SMALLCap Fund, emphasizing its focus on emerging growth companies and consistent long-term performance under Robert Kern. It also covered Bancroft Convertible Fund and its defense against takeover attempts. The issue reviewed convertible fund strategies, investment research discipline, and portfolio diversification, promoting patience and selective value investing amid market volatility.

The Scott Letter, March 1989
II3
March 1989

The March 1989 Scott Letter highlighted Source Capital for its consistent long-term performance and disciplined, value-driven management under George Michaelis. It also profiled Bunker Hill Income Securities, emphasizing credit quality and risk control. The issue advised investors on selecting bond funds, warning against new issues and favoring seasoned funds with low expenses, proven records, and stable management.

DISCLOSURES:

CEFData.com provides data and information on closed-end funds (CEFs), business development companies (BDCs), interval funds, tender offer funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and London-listed closed-end funds. CEFData.com is an information service provided by CEF Advisors, Inc., a registered investment advisor. The data and materials presented are for informational purposes only, are not intended to be relied upon as investment advice or recommendations, and do not constitute a solicitation to buy or sell any security. This information should not be considered specific legal, investment, or tax advice. Investors should consult each fund’s sponsor for detailed, fund-specific risk disclosures and/or seek the guidance of a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

NOTES: Distribution type is sourced from CEFData.com. For specific information about a fund's distribution sources, please visit the fund sponsor's website.

The following applies to CEFs, BDCs, interval funds, tender offer funds, ETFs, and London-listed CEFs: Fund shares are not guaranteed or endorsed by any bank or insured depository institution and are not federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). These securities involve investment risks, including the possible loss of principal. There can be no assurance that a fund’s investment objectives will be achieved. Many closed-end funds and similar exchange traded vehicles frequently trade at a discount or premium to their net asset value (NAV). NAV returns are net of fund expenses and assume reinvestment of distributions.

Performance information, if presented, is for illustrative purposes only. Actual client returns may differ based on individual account holdings, timing, fees, and other factors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. All investments involve risk, including the risk of loss.Data is obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, accuracy, completeness, and timeliness cannot be guaranteed. Information may change without notice, and CEF Advisors is under no obligation to update such information. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only, and CEF Advisors does not control or guarantee the accuracy or relevance of information on third-party sites. This material is presented for informational purposes only. Under no circumstances should it be considered an offer to sell, or a solicitation to buy, any investment product.

© CEF Advisors, Inc. and CEFData.com 2026. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication, or redistribution of CEF Advisors or CEFData.com content, including by caching, framing, or similar means, is expressly prohibited without prior written consent. CEF Advisors shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Find Out How CEF Advisors Can Help You Get The Most Out Of CEF Investing.